Welcome to The Conversation
Y2K AWARENESS
|
"Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour, |
Y2K Awareness, January 11, 1999 More Y2K Fodder, January 28, 1999 Y2K Milestone, February 18, 1999 Outside the Lines for Y2K, March 5, 1999 More Y2K Awareness, July 29, 1999 No Pain, No Gain??, October 15, 1999 Y2K Update, December 10, 1999 Some Good Y2K Links |
Reactions to a meeting of Y2K "officials" on April 22, 1999, in Hollywood Bill Dale Y2K Commentary Los Angeles Gets a Y2K Wake-up Call Suzanne's Take: A Social Commentary "The Miracle of Y2K," November 18, 1998 |
The Conversation Develops: FROM: Robert Theobald, 1/13/99
|
. |
Y2K AWARENESS As a sort of mass awakening is taking place over Clinton, where many people are getting stirred from political apathy into having opinions about the system of government we are in, the big subject looming is Y2K. Awareness
about this is starting to become widespread. Among preparedness groups,
concern as to what will happen because of mechanical failure is matched by
worry about public reaction when the full scope of this problem is widely
understood. Robert Theobald, a preparedness activist, said in a recent
email, "Panic is a greater danger than technology failures." Is there any
sense in being pro-active to deal with this, as Theobald would like to see
happen? |
FROM: Arjuna da Silva, 1/11/99
|
Suzanne Replies: The Y2K buzz gets louder all the time. I figure prepare for it being bad. Maybe it won't be. But maybe it will. Preparedness groups are emerging "everywhere," although I haven't heard of any in L.A. Smaller places perhaps can get some safety by working things out. I doubt if there's much safety that can be achieved in big city reality -- am myself thinking I'll not be here for the holiday, and will see if it's safe to come back. Have bought a year's worth of dried food -- figure it covers my kids and me for awhile, and will take it with us if we leave. Have a friend who's equipping a place in the gold country in northern California, so have myself at least covered for where to go. Mostly am watching and seeing. Don't know about martial law, etc. -- lots of stories, but don't know more than you do. Ain't it a weird world!!!! |
FROM: Bill Mitnik, 1/19/99 STOP THIS DISCUSSION RIGHT NOW. This is how I see it. Several years ago the Pleiadians-Plus and others warned us about the media. You can chase what the media brokers dangle out in front of you if you want. O. J. Simpson, Clinton scandals, Y2K, etc. You can allow yourselves to be distracted by the controllers if you want. There are holograms, subliminals, and lots of other ways to orchestrate the masses. I feel we should be concentrating on our evolution as a planetary race of powerful God-men. Many of us are here at this time to raise the Vibration of the Planet. This is done through individual and group meditation methods, encouragement, compassion, and prayer. It is also done in the workplace and any other place Co-creativity and Co-creativeness have been made receptive. Humankind is ready to evolve. All of our thoughts are connected so each thought of Love raises all of Humankind. I try and remain media-free although it is difficult. I don’t have to place my attention where the media thinks it should be. I have my own Focus. Don’t be duped. Don’t be a pawn. Thanks for letting me share. |
Suzanne Replies: Great response. Certainly right up there in the handful of top ideas. Do you want to argue for it being a higher truth than what comes of involvement on the social plane? Dangerous presumption, I think. The subject matter isn't the deciding factor. Put whatever you will on the screen, and see who shows up as the viewer. Every subject matter is holy, don't you think? And where "we" meet seems to me a special place of power, where we can thank the affairs of the day for the grist for our co-creation. God is right here, right now, in the space between us. Re Y2K, I'm reminded of some famous quote that I haven't got verbatim now, but it's from "Lazy Man's Guide to Enlightenment," I think -- or maybe Richard Bach's "Illusions." It talks about getting hit by a truck if you don't get off the road. Don't shine Y2K on, because it has lots of steam, and you don't want to get blown away. |
Bill replies to Suzanne, 1/30/99: I spend no time masturbating about Y2K gloom and doom. Create a beautiful reality instead with visualization, thought, and energy. |
Suzanne Replies: I appreciate your passion. It gives us grist for creating a meeting of minds. Do you really mean that you won't "prepare?" I am curious how far you, and others, who would say the same sort of thing, would take it. Are you paying attention but not wanting to give added energy by exchanging info about these issues, or are you just unplugged? I think about the ancient dictum, "All praise to Allah, but keep your camel tied." Another perspective is in regard to how we all will need to relate more interdependently to handle Y2K. As I've said before, that's the up-side. How about the encouragement of community as reason to spread awareness? |
Bill replies to Suzanne, 2/17/99: An Article from a London Newspaper (circa 999 A.D.): Canterbury, England. A.D. 999. An atmosphere close to panic prevails today throughout Europe as the millennial year 1000 approaches, bringing with it the so-called "Y1K Bug," a menace which, until recently, hardly anyone had ever heard of. Prophets of doom are warning that the entire fabric of Western Civilization, based as it now is upon monastic computations, could collapse, and that there is simply not enough time left to fix the problem. [This goes on from here, as you might expect....editor] |
Suzanne Replies: Your previous communications, it seems to me, called up a conversation and exploration about where we put our energies and how we create reality. This email, mocking the Y2K situation, as if it is nonsense, alarms me. From my own perspective, I let all the prophesies, with which our New Age brethren tend to be fascinated, roll off me. Who knows? In this instance, there is hard data to deal with. If you are paying attention -- i.e. not ignoring everything in the material world while keeping focus on the spiritual one -- I can't see how you could do anything as a responsible person except make some emergency contingency plans. Do you think your mockery could be irresponsible? |
Bill replies to Suzanne, 2/17/99: What about our planet? Where did all these races come from, anyway??? It is quite a tale to tell as we Awaken to who we really are, Suzanne. "HU" is an ancient word for "God". We are "HU MAN." What's all this got to do with Y2K? I haven't a clue. I really got off the track, didn't I? We, as a race, are survivors. I, like you, Suzanne, are working to help our race survive. We must. |
FROM: Jim Conn, 1/21/99 |
Suzanne Replies: Exhilarating, indeed. Hope we can be so jovial January 1! |
The Conversation Develops: FROM: Nori Muster, 1/30/99 |
. |
MORE Y2K FODDER For anybody who still doesn't see Y2K as a formidable subject worthy of
attention, I call your attention to what was said in a featured piece in
the
Magazine section of the January 17 Los Angeles Times. It was focused on
the Y2K head person for L.A. County, Jon Fullinwider, who sounds like
a thoughtful, interesting, capable man: "Fullinwider is regularly employed
by treasurers from cities around California to please, please help convince
their city councils that this is serious." |
FROM: Arjuna Nick Ardagh, Author of Relaxing Into Clear Seeing, 2/2/99 |
Suzanne Replies: So I have a question. Do you buy insurance? I so appreciate the chance to share our thoughts! |
Arjuna replies to Suzanne, 2/2/99: Good point!! And well taken. I do buy car insurance, because its the law. But actually I do not do a lot of other insurance. My main point was that trust and relaxation is in itself a creative act that will bear its own fruit. |
FROM: Yvonne von Gulker, near Grass Valley, California, 2/5/99 |
Suzanne Replies: Glad to know there's a pad ready for me, Yvonne! |
FROM: Jacotte, Paris, France, 2/7/99 |
Suzanne Replies: Just got to be careful about a certain glibness, which creeps into some conversations I get into, where all us wise guys get excited about the demise of all the unworkablility of our world. If so, there could be unbelievable hardship -- we mustn't get passive because of how good it will be that may not be in evidence till way past our lifetimes. |
FROM: David Lorimer, Scientific and Medical Network, 2/14/99
|
Suzanne Replies: Do you think this self-fulfilling prophesy idea is operative in this instance? I get the rules of reality in which a stand calls up its opposition. However, it seems to me that we are looking at a truck bearing down, which can squash us if we don't get off the road. (Do you remember where this oft-quoted idea -- better stated in the accurate quote -- comes from? "Illusions?" "Lazy Man's Guide to Enlightenment?") I think what you're talking about is panic behavior -- and problems that might not be problems but for collective thinking (as different from the danger zones from mechanical failure, like fuel and electricity). This panic threat, which is very real, is different in that it's a disaster in the making that theoretically could be averted. How can the collective come together in a mutually beneficial way? A tricky question, which so far only has been addressed in local pockets, which can't do anything about bank runs. Everyone acknowledges this is the challenge, but no one has even tried to grapple with it beyond raising it to the level of awareness. Nobody knows what else to do. Of course no collective voice exists. Of all auspices I would trust to spark such a thing, it would be yours. I want to give you that calibration about yourself. |
The Conversation Develops: FROM: Drexel Sprecker, 2/18/99 |
. |
Y2K MILESTONE I considered this noteworthy enough to send to everyone in my email address book: |
FROM: Steve Purkaple, 2/18/99
|
Suzanne Replies: I don't get any pictures as precise as yours, and will just have to wait and see if the drama you foresee will unfold. I think linking up in a meditative space is a very good idea. We don't know how powerful it might be -- I don't know how you can measure here, either -- but I can feel the gentling of everything and the release of fear in a shared experience of inner connection. Do you think about the whole world meditatively linking up? |
The Conversation Develops: |
. |
OUTSIDE THE LINES FOR Y2K Although there is some residual chuckling at Y2K "survivalist
crazies," and how dire things might get is still being minimized,
the media is getting up to speed on the seriousness of the
situation. I don't think there needs to be any more prodding to
focus attention on preparedness. One way activists could serve
now is to look "outside the lines" for unprecedented ways to deal
with an unprecedented challenge -- in Einsteinian-fashion, to
look for solutions on a level of consciousness different from the
one in which the problem was created. |
FROM: Jim Conn, 3/7/99
|
Suzanne Replies: Good to hear. Educational. And education is what's needed. I need it as part of a social labyrinth in which I have no facility at being a neighbor. Although I grew up on a neighborly block on Long Island, it is very foreign to contemplate such a thing now. The way it goes. Interesting that the more affluent people are, the less equipped they are to take care of what could be ahead. Uncivilized native tribes will do best. Strange inversion -- and perhaps a gift for this dying, materially well-off world. A wake-up before it is too late. Touch and go about that. Really touch and go. That's the spur. Everything needs a spur. Thought you were going to conclude with advice not to look to the stars, so to speak, but to look to neighbors. I was going to agree, and point out that in order to look to the stars we'd have to be looking to the neighbors -- a melt into one. Actually wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea about my thoughts -- like looking for saviors. Not so. Do you want to meet with some of us lost souls, who would do better with a little encouragement and help? I can see people who wouldn't act otherwise becoming more comfortable to take on their own affluent neighborhoods. I can feel it in myself just reading what you wrote. The success of any venture is usually a reflection of the capacity of the leader, and I'm sure your soulful strength was at the heart of the success you had. Takes a stretch to go through the next band of resistant reality, but maybe you could have impact on that, too, with some added effort as I am suggesting. |
Jim replies to Suzanne, 3/9/99: Hi! Yes, I'd be willing to meet with a group of your friends regarding this matter of how we build a community that can transcend Y2K and even survive more effectively as a community. It could be fun. |
FROM: Mark Frautsch, 3/19/99 |
Suzanne Replies: Finding the Shakespeare & Tao site was such a relief. Something to plug into that feels like home -- the intellect, the authenticity, the artistry. And thanks so much for asking my opinion. You are speaking into a crack in the cosmos, between the fixed idea of individuation as supreme, and the leap over to where we are perceiving ourselves as one system. The rush to acquisition has everyone lonely and unsatisfied, with no center that can hold as the split grows wider between haves and have-nots. We've hit the wall, where more of the same isn't going to solve this. So we are all groping and grasping, a situation in which feminine virtues come in handy. But don't expect the feminine now to take on leadership, looking somehow for the masculine translation of the same endeavor. The endeavor itself is different, an oozing up rather than a thrusting out, and thank God that there is an alternative energy of the feminine that will be in play that, for survival sake, will be the new determinant. It seems to me that what is lacking is not women stepping forward, but a quality of interchange. The Internet, God bless it, is still more presentational for the powers that be -- from political to intellectual -- than it is interactive. It is an under-used instrument for thinking together, which indeed would be a feminine methodology. Conception, gestation and birth is what it could sustain. The birth of ideas, as different from the delivery of goods, is a function of intimate inter-penetration. Aha, I see you, I receive you, I am you. Some of this is evoked by the turn of events -- I believe we glimpsed a new reality when Princess Di died, and the world showed up as a compassionate whole. Like the astronauts seeing earth as one ball, we saw our one-heartedness, and I think it forever changed us. Other changes, however, I believe could be orchestrated to break us out of traditional patterns. But that orchestration needs to be in very intimate style. I still feel like there's a lot of ownership and dominator energy being played out in the Y2K arena, even on the part of the best willed men. It's not vicious or cut-throat, but just the natural vestige of the male way. We need some intention, it seems to me, to go beyond our entrenched style to create more interchange among those whose intelligence could reshape the world. That is what interests me. Perhaps Y2K is flushing out a new non-hierarchical grid that would approximate the energy of the philosopher king. Perhaps those leaders, male and female, who function in the material world and are of soulful bent, will find each other. In feminine fashion, perhaps they will link to create a pattern so right and so radiant that it becomes the guiding force of what lies ahead. Another picture I keep seeing is someone in high position -- like our president -- being so real that he or she can say anything. I don't think we need certainty from our leaders as much as we need honesty. It's a new policy, and almost hard to imagine anyone but a woman, at this time, being able to pull it off. At the risk of being stoned, I, deeply ingrained as a Democrat, thought the Republican House Managers had the right voice. That they were so compromised by prior activity, however, rendered them less credible than I believe they deserved to be. What do we do in a system so devoid of role models? Something radical, for sure. Get us the right woman, or conceivably even a wrong one in the White House, and we may best be able to cope with the tricky reality that lies ahead. |
Mark replies to Suzanne, 3/20/99
|
FROM: Lane Core Jr., 3/20/99
|
Suzanne Replies: We do not disagree. I think there's a good chance that the world may implode, and this possibility is not the subject of public dialogue. Were we being smart, I think we'd be preparing for the worst -- real survival stuff in a world without power. What I was noting was that we've passed a milestone of recognition by the populace, which has a wave of truthfulness that has started to undulate through it. At least people aren't laughing and are concerned. In the meantime, something that gets me sparked is the possibility that some people -- like you and me -- will find each other. We've needed a wisdom voice on earth, and as the cream rises to the top of this churning cauldron, perhaps an intelligence might become aligned enough to be of value in that regard. Do you know Laurence Victor? I could spend the rest of my life on his site (he suggested I start at http://azstarnet.com/~nuu/INVITATION/invitation-top.htm). |
The Conversation Develops:
From: Michael Dowd, Portland Sustainable Lifestyle Campaign, 7/29/99 |
. |
Y2K AWARENESS "The greatest antidote to worry, whether you're getting ready
for spaceflight or facing a problem of daily life, is preparation...
the more you try to envision what might happen and what your
best response and options are, the more you are able to allay
your fears about the future.
Despite the temptation to believe writings which scoff at Y2K in
major magazines and newspapers -- unbelievable! -- and to be
assuaged by the light-hearted treatment of Y2K in TV commercials ,
we endanger ourselves by not taking seriously enough the trouble
we could be in. Just look at the telling signs that we can see for
ourselves. Look at the billions of dollars that have been expended,
to grasp the scope of this problem. For a stark truth about
unpreparedness, just look outside the US, where countries range
from having done nothing to at best being three years behind us. |
FROM: Bill Ashforth
|
Suzanne Replies: Yes, in this world where mutuality is not the standard, it does take something dramatic for people's attention to turn to the greater good. But I think we have to be careful of our holy mission, where we define the game and then criticize people for not meeting our expectations. "Some Will, Some Won't," sounds right, but "So What?" has a kind of superior air to it that I don't like. We do need to do what works instead of beating dead horses, but when you take on service, you have to keep looking for how best to deliver rather than railing at recipients who are ungratefulo for what you decided they needed (even if they do). Does this make sense? Nice to be sharing ideas. |
The Conversation Develops: Nori Muster, 10/15/99 |
. |
NO PAIN, NO GAIN??? With frustration running high among the network of Y2K activists who are in touch in
cyberspace, we had our bimonthly telephone conference call last week. (The call,
funded by the government, lets 25 or so bright, dedicated leaders strategize about
preparation for Y2K.) The featured discussant was John Koskinen, Clinton's Y2K
chairperson, who recently said, "This is obviously the biggest management problem
the world has ever seen." Koskinen was as frustrated as the rest of us were about
how to make the public aware of how serious things could be. There was something
surreal about his interest in preparation, given that Clinton, by telling us how well things
are going, is lulling everyone into inaction. Just this morning, Alan Greenspan echoed
the Clinton crazy-making, reporting that indeed the public's fears are waning in the
face of "how far we have come" in Y2K remediation -- but that we are not yet "home
free" in being a confident public, which is all that would be needed to make us safe
and sound. Granted that Clinton is between a rock and a hard place, with reassurance
protecting the corporate status quo and everyone benefiting from a good economy --
but, again, Clinton is sinning by omission, not giving us what we need to navigate
in not coming forth with the truth. |
FROM: Lysa Leland, 10/19/99
|
Suzanne Replies: We are saying the same thing. At least we know what each other is talking about. Somehow heating up this conversation, getting us connected, uniting our voices, is where the next possibilities lie. Am always looking to that happening... |
The Conversation Develops: FROM: Lane Core, 12/11/99 |
. |
Y2K UPDATE Paula Zahn, who has an hour-long show on Fox News Channel, M-F, at 7 P.M. pst, (10 P.M. est), has announced that she will be doing "hard-hitting, in-depth" reporting
on Y2K all next week. The final line of her promo says, "Y2K...if you're not worried,
you should be." I was amazed to find the most
responsible, straightforward Y2K reporting that I've seen from a mainstream news
source at FoxNews.com -- hit the button on the right that says, "CLICK HERE for a Y2K update." You are being deceived by the powers that be about the potential seriousness of Y2K. Those in charge of the financial goings-on in this country are of the opinion that your knowing how bad things can become would cause trouble at the banks and with the stock market. We are of the belief that this concern for financial well-being, even though real, is not good reason to camouflage the potential disastrousness that could lie ahead for some people, if not for everyone, at the turn of the millennium and for some indeterminate period thereafter. Preparedness literally could make the difference for many between life and death. Any message to the contrary cannot be supported by the facts. This is an urging that everyone be ready for Y2K. Take precautions for the worst that could occur. [signed by recognizable names] From: Walt Patrick For what it's worth, I don't see Y2K getting serious until late in January. The economy is a marvelous thing with lots of momentum, and like a bull elephant in charge mode, just shooting out its heart won't bring it to an immediate halt. Setting aside the wild-card possibilities, I don't see any way that the oil distribution / refining system isn't going to experience substantial shortfalls. The modern lifestyle is based on cheap, regular and adequate supplies of gasoline. Given that the oil crisis of '73 only represented a 7% actual shortfall in supply, I'm expecting serious disruptions to start showing up in the latter half of January. Given our dependence on foreign oil from Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, automotive parts from Mexico and Brazil, our involvement with Japanese banks, etc., I was particularly impressed by the testimony two months ago of Jacqueline Williams-Bridgers, the U.S. State Department's Inspector General, to the U.S. Senate's special committee on Y2K. She said, "These assessments suggest that the global community is likely to experience varying degrees of Y2K-related failures in every sector, in every region, and at every economic level. As such, the risk of disruption will likely extend to the international trade arena, where a breakdown in any part of the global supply chain would have a serious impact on the U.S. and world economies." My question for those who feel that Y2K will only be a bump in the road would be, "Which part of 'every' is unclear?" Given the current level of dependency on automobiles in our culture, we can't afford more than a percent or two disruption in overall gasoline availability without triggering adverse social reactions (those who were around in '73 know what I mean). The odds that the interruption in gasoline availability will be no more than a couple of percent aren't very good... A couple of years back, as IT managers started to look seriously at Y2K, they had two choices: fix the old or create the new. Many a company made the reasonable decision to start from scratch and recode every critical system they had. Like Boeing, which isn't surprising given the nature of their business and their capacity for taking on complicated technical projects that have to be completed on deadline. Still, they had some interesting surprises. Like the test on the 757. They rolled the clock forward, and then went looking for problems. Two hours of checking didn't turn up anything, so the plane started to taxi to the runway. Half-way there, the computer shut down. It turns out that the bug had caused the computer's cooling fan to fail to come on. After running for two hours without a fan, the computer overheated and shut down. Lots of other companies also took the second path. While this plan has a great potential payoff, i.e. the latest software running on the latest machines, there is one really big risk. If the software isn't completed on time, a situation known to occur on occasion :-), the company can find itself caught between an old system that will no longer work after the first of the year, and a new system that won't work yet. Even worse, in trying to make the transition, they can corrupt their data base and be left with the added task of having to do a new physical inventory. This is the sort of thing that's starting to show up. It's not being talked about on the evening Happy News, but that's hardly surprising. For example, Hershey's Y2K program cost them their largest sales weekend of the year. You may not have noticed, but Hersey didn't make it for Halloween this year, and probably won't make it for Christmas. Lost sales are said to be in the $100M range. Now, it's true that western civilization won't grind to a halt because of a lack of chocolate, but it's also true that there are a lot of human faces in pain disguised by a figure like that. The loss of one end-product manufacturer involves losses for the business that supply them, as well as the businesses which depend on their employee's paychecks... Volkswagen Europe is another example of a company that took the second path. They finished their new software with two months to spare. But it takes a lot more than two months to test complex software, and, to save time, they passed up the step of operating the old and new systems in parallel. The upshot there is that the new software corrupted their old database, and they haven't been able to ship parts for the last two weeks. The best description I've heard recently is the comparison to Christmas tree lights -- not the old series kind where the burning out of one bulb would shut down the string, but it's more like the new kind that have a by-pass circuit in the base so that if a filament fails, the base shorts out to let the power keep flowing. The problem there is that the rest of the bulbs then have to deal with the fractionally higher voltage. As more filaments fail, the rest of the filaments have to carry the load, and tend to burn out correspondingly more quickly. In time, this leads to a cascading failure of all the lights left in the string. While none of these examples puts the world at risk, each of them does put a bunch of people through a whole lot of grief. As light after light on the productivity tree winks out, the tension level rises. And then we get to the IRS's assurance that they have their contingency plan in place. They expect to be able to issue 10,000 refund checks by hand per day. Given that last year they issued some 80 million checks, that should only take them some 36 years working at that rate. Faster if they authorize overtime :-) How are people going to react if they're told to not expect their tax refund in this lifetime? Anyway, just some thoughts on a rainy morning. It's going to be a very interesting year. December 14, 1999 [After watching The Edge on 12/13] What lame coverage. Who'da thunk Paula Zahn would do only a couple of pallid minutes, essentially telling us we were OK, after the dramatic promo that's been flooding the Fox News Channel for days? Has "scary Y2K" become a way to sucker listeners in? And then, why not draw the conclusion that we are in danger, as promised, especially when the guy they were interviewing said trouble was ahead? The crazy beat marches on.... -Suzanne- |
FROM: Drexel Sprecker, 12/11/99
|
Suzanne Replies: "Cascading" failures is what's talked about. Yes. Scary to think how screwed up things can get. Makes perfect sense in this highly connected world. Funny we are so connected and so disconnected... |
Drexel replies to Suzanne:
|
Suzanne Replies: Yes. I agree. Every radical technological development has allowed culture/consciousness to transform -- the printing press for example. A fascinating historical study there. Wish I knew where to find a good narrative about this. The Internet is the new ball game. Still in its infancy, but you can already feel the power of the people, so to speak, where we rise out of subjugation to the leader, transcending the dualistic trap in which we have been mired. Of course nowadays we are always in danger of self-destruction -- technology too good before consciousness mitigates. Prayers are in order. |
FROM: David Langer, 12/11/99
|
Suzanne Replies: It's a hard tiger to get by the tail, preparedness-wise, even if you have resources. There aren't enough resources to prepare for the worst. So you want to look at survival that you could do something about if it's the worst it could be without something so bad we dare not even chat about it. People in the cold need to know what to do if no fuel. People on the 30th floor better think about electricity outage. Everybody needs to do water. My own choice has been to lay in dried food (a year's worth for one) as my emergency what-I-am- doing-about-a-worst-case. (Food is a bargain now at all the suppliers -- they are overstocked because people didn't buy as expected). I also am growing veggies in patio high-yield boxes I bought (yummy now). I got a cheap solar radio (works good for regular use) with a flashlight, and another solar flashlight. No stuff for fun and games or anything like normal life should things get awful awful -- but hopefully I would be better at making it through. Other thing for my somewhat complete picture is that the only money I have in the stock market is in a hedge fund that's been created based on Y2K, with pay-off if things go down. Wish people had been concerned enough for a national minute of silence to have been enacted -- all praying might have been better than some praying, as we understand the laws of stuff like that... |
FROM: Chip Winborne, 12/11/99
|
Suzanne Replies: Foxiness is always in order. And highest service. On Y2K, my conclusions are drawn that we are on an insane course. People are naked with winter coming on. Why do you need psychological preparedness for nothing? And if something, why not board the windows for the impending hurricane? This is from a recent email from a hotshot activist, Leon Kappleman: I am genuinely glad to hear that you enjoy my musings. I greatly respect whatever you are thinking and look forward to hearing more. |